|   | 
	
		|  | 2004 Data Status File from WHPO/SIO for WOCE line(s) P02: 492SSY9310_1 and 492SSY9310_2 |   |  
		|  |  |   | 
        | Data History & Updates |   | | Line Number: ExpoCode:
 Cruise Date:
 Ship Name:
 Country:
 
 | P02E 492SSY9310_1
 1993/10/14
 SHOYO
 JPN
 | 
 |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2004/02/02 | Anderson, S. | CTDSAL | Website Updated | Yes | QALTY flags corrected, stn 156 |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Made changes to QUALT1 flags for sta. 156 line p02e2 re Lynne Talley's email. Put corrected file online, made new exchange file. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2004/02/02 | Anderson, S. | PHSPHT/NO3/O2 | Data Reformatted/OnLine | Yes | Data Reformatted/OnLine |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Made changes to QUALT1 flags for stas. 61 and 78, line p02e1 re Lynne Talley's email. Put corrected file online, made new exhcange file. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2004/01/31 | Talley, L. | CTDSAL | Update Needed | Yes | flags need to be corrected, stn 156 |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I think some quality flags need to be changed on these lines (stn 156) in p02e2hy.txt:
 
 The CTDSAL values here are -9.0000 so shouldn't the quality flags be 9
 instead of 4?
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2004/01/31 | Talley, L. | PHSPHT/NO3/O2 | Update Needed | Yes | flags need to be corrected |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| some flagging questions for p02e1hy.txt. 1. The phosphates and nitrates for bottles 20,21, 22 on stations 21 are really
 bad (phosphates are completely unphysical).  The phosphate flag at bottle 22 is
 6, but is 3 on the other bottles.  Shouldn't it just be 4 on all bottles?
 Or at least consistent?
 
 2. Oxygen at bottle 21 on station 78 is a bad outlier. It should at a minimum
 be flagged as 3 (should really be a 4).
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2003/04/02 | Coartney, L. | DOC | Website Updated | Yes | New PDF and text docs online |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| New PDF and text docs online. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2002/04/16 | Anderson, S. | CTD | Data Update | Yes | Station 119: SALNTY & Surface Temp flages changed to 4 |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Replaced p02e2ct.zip with file from Lynne Talley. Station 119 had bad salinity and temperature at the surface, she changed flags to 4. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2002/04/12 | Talley, L. | CTD | Update Needed | Yes | See Note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Hi Masao - just checking on some things on the p2 CTD data - I think some flags need to be changed.  This shouldn't replace real data quality control, but I'm not sure that it will ever be done here.  So I'd like to go ahead and flag things as bad if necessary. 
 P02E: station 119 has a very high surface salinity and low temperature. These look suspicious - density is much too high compared with next point underneath.  Most stations have -9 values at this surface point.  Should the flags here be changed to 4 for both temperature and salinity?  Or the data values replaced with -9?
 EXPOCODE 492SSY9310_2   WHP-ID P2E   DATE 111693
 19990414LDTWHPOSIO
 STNNBR 119    CASTNO  1   NO.RECORDS= 2489     2
 INSTRUMENT NO. S/N1194   SAMPLING RATE 25.00HZ 3
 CTDPRS  CTDTMP  CTDSAL CTDOXY   NUMBER  QUALT1
 DBAR  ITS-90  PSS-78 UMOL/KG    OBS.       *
 ******* ******* ******* *******               *
 0.0 20.8356 36.0708    -9.0      -9    2225
 2.0 22.2238 35.3254    -9.0      -9    2225
 4.0 22.2201 35.3243    -9.0      -9    2225
 6.0 22.2220 35.3240    -9.0      -9    2225
 8.0 22.2151 35.3241    -9.0      -9    2225
 10.0 22.2202 35.3243    -9.0      -9    2225
 12.0 22.2186 35.3173    -9.0      -9    2225
 14.0 22.2193 35.3232    -9.0      -9    2225
 16.0 22.2208 35.3228    -9.0      -9    2225
 
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2002/01/24 | Tibbetts, R. | DOC | Website Updated | Yes | pdf, txt versions online |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Final text and pdf docs online 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2002/01/02 | Diggs, S. | CTD | Website Updated | Yes | CSV File Added, see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| CTD files updated and slight refomatting was performed for conversion to Exchange format. P02e CTD zip archives now exclude stations from p02c. New ZIP archives of WOCE CTD and Exchange CTD formatted files are now on the website. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/12/06 | Diggs, S. | CTD/BTL/SUM | Website Updated | Yes | Files reformatted and online, see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I have put all of the new P02e files on-line (with nutrients).  I have attached Sarilee's reformatting note (kinda long).  Sarilee also reformatted the SUM file and put it out n the website as well. 
 thanks,
 -sd
 ---->
 Merged the nutrients into the .sea files for P02E.
 
 The nutrient file had two sta. 35.  When I compared the pressures of the second sta. 35 in the nutrient file with the pressures for sta. 36 in the .sea it was obvious that the station designation in the nutrient file should have been 36.
 
 Ditto above only for sta. 105.  Should have been 106 in the nutrient file.
 
 There were numerous levels throughout the file that had 0 as the sample and/or bottle number.  These levels had no data and were not in the .sea file and were not merged into the .sea file.
 
 Stas. 36 and 37 had at 5501.1 and 5500.5 respectively a value of 972.51 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  The QUALT1 flag was 9 for each of them.  These are impossible values for these parameters so I changed the values to -9.00.
 
 Sta. 40 at 1000.0db had 99 for QUALT1 flags but a value of 113.91 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  Changed PHSPHT value to -9.00, SILCAT value is reasonable.  Changed QUALT1 flags to 39.
 
 List of stations where QUALT1 flags were not consistent with the data.  I changed them so they agree with the data.
 
 NOTE - most of the QUALT1 flags in the nutrient file were 3, so I used 3 when changing Q1 codes, except in one case where the data were obviously bad.
 
 Leg 1
 
 Sta.	Press.	Orig. Q1 	New Q1
 46	 797.7	   993	       933
 53	1748.5	  399	       393
 54	 698.1	   399	       393
 60	  50.9	    993	       933
 66	 999.2	   399	       393
 72	1000.1	  399	       393
 75	2250.8	  999	       939
 81	 399.5	   999	       939
 81	5001.4	  999	       939
 82	3000.9	  999	       939
 83	2999.7	  399	       393
 84	2500.8	  999	       939
 85	1999.5	  999	       939
 85	2497.6	  999	       939
 86	2501.2	  999	       939
 89	2499.5	  999	       939
 90	1499.5	  949	       449
 91	2500.6	  999	       939
 95	2250.3	  999	       939
 94	2248.5	  999	       939
 96	1999.5	  999	       939
 96	2249.8	  399	       393
 96	3999.2	  999	       939
 
 Leg 2
 Sta.	Press.	Orig. Q1	New Q1
 99	 799.0	  999	      939
 101	  48.2	  999	      939
 102	4497.2	999	      939
 103	2495.3	999	      939
 105	5000.3	999	      939
 106	 100.8	 399	      393
 106	 900.5	 999	      939
 106	4500.0	999	      939
 107	2000.8	999	      939
 107	2498.2	999	      939
 107	2999.8	999	      939
 107	4000.0	999	      939
 111	1498.2	999	      939
 112	5000.7	999	      939
 114	6001.3	999	      939
 115	2501.8	999	      939
 117	 601.7	 399        393
 117	 998.2	 399	      393
 119	2001.3	999	      939
 119	4001.6	999	      939
 120	2499.4	999	      939
 122	2250.0	999	      939
 123	4000.9	999	      939
 126	2497.8	999	      939
 126	3998.5	999	      939
 127	4501.6	999	      939
 128	  48.6	  999	      939
 128	4001.8	999	      939
 129	3501.4	999	      939
 130	1999.8	999	      939
 130	2248.2	999	      939
 130	3997.8	999	      939
 132	3998.9	999	      939
 133	2247.8	999	      939
 133	2503.2	999	      939
 133	4504.6	999	      939
 134	3998.5	999	      939
 135	3496.9	999	      939
 135	3500.1	999	      939
 136	3499.7	999	      939
 138	4000.6	999	      939
 139	4000.4	999	      939
 140	4001.1	999	      939
 141	4000.0	999	      939
 142	2250.2	999	      939
 143	3999.6	999	      939
 144	3999.6	999	      939
 145	 499.1	 999	      939
 145	3999.4	999	      939
 145	4003.2	999	      939
 146	2449.9	999	      939
 146	3499.4	999	      939
 150	3001.2	999        939
 153	3498.0	999	      939
 158	3498.9	999	      939
 159	3498.9	999	      939
 162	 203.4	 399	      393
 163	 400.3 	999	      939
 163	 704.9 	999	      939
 
 13 April 2001  Sarilee Anderson
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/12/03 | Diggs, S. | CTD/BTL | Website Updated | Yes | CSV File Added, see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| BOTTLE  converted to exchange format and placed files online. CTD still non-public?
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/07/17 | Diggs, S. | BTL/SUM | Website Updated | Yes | new P02e files on-line, SUM file reformatted |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| SUM, Bottle: (silcat, no2 no3, phspht) I have put all of the new P02e files on-line (with nutrients) at Lynne Talley's request. I have also attached Sarilee's reformatting note (kinda long). Sarilee also reformatted the SUM file and I have put it out on the website as well.
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/20 | Anderson, S. | NUTs | Data Merged | Yes |  |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I have merged the nutrients into the .sea file for P02E leg 1 and 2. The files are on whpo in sarilee/FTP/S_ANDERSON/P02E.  I reformatted the .sum file while I was at it.  There is a notes file explaining, I hope, what I did. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/20 | Anderson, S. | NUTs/SUM | Data Merged into OnLine File | Yes | Data Merged into OnLine File; SUM Reformated |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I have merged the nutrients into the .sea file for P02E leg 1 and 2.  The files are on whpo in sarilee/FTP/S_ANDERSON/P02E.  I reformatted the .sum file while I was at it.  There is a notes file explaining, I hope, what I did: 
 Merged the nutrients into the .sea files for P02E.
 
 The nutrient file had two sta. 35.  When I compared the pressures of the second sta. 35 in the nutrient file with the pressures for sta. 36 in the .sea it was obvious that the station designation in the nutrient file should have been 36.
 
 Ditto above only for sta. 105.  Should have been 106 in the nutrient file.
 
 There were numerous levels throughout the file that had 0 as the sample and/or bottle number.  These levels had no data and were not in the .sea file and were not merged into the .sea file.
 
 Stas. 36 and 37 had at 5501.1 and 5500.5 respectively a value of 972.51 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  The QUALT1 flag was 9 for each of them.  These are impossible values for these parameters so I changed the values to -9.00.
 
 Sta. 40 at 1000.0db had 99 for QUALT1 flags but a value of 113.91 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  Changed PHSPHT value to -9.00, SILCAT value is reasonable.  Changed QUALT1 flags to 39.
 
 List of stations where QUALT1 flags were not consistent with the data.  I changed them so they agree with the data.
 
 NOTE - most of the QUALT1 flags in the nutrient file were 3, so I used 3 when changing Q1 codes, except in one case where the data were obviously bad.
 
 Leg 1
 
 Sta.	Press.	Orig. Q1 	New Q1
 46	 797.7	993	933
 53	1748.5	399	393
 54	 698.1	399	393
 60	  50.9	993	933
 66	 999.2	399	393
 72	1000.1	399	393
 75	2250.8	999	939
 81	 399.5	999	939
 81	5001.4	999	939
 82	3000.9	999	939
 83	2999.7	399	393
 84	2500.8	999	939
 85	1999.5	999	939
 85	2497.6	999	939
 86	2501.2	999	939
 89	2499.5	999	939
 90	1499.5	949	449
 91	2500.6	999	939
 95	2250.3	999	939
 94	2248.5	999	939
 96	1999.5	999	939
 96	2249.8	399	393
 96	3999.2	999	939
 
 Leg 2
 Sta.	Press.	Orig. Q1	New Q1
 99	 799.0	999	939
 101	  48.2	999	939
 102	4497.2	999	939
 103	2495.3	999	939
 105	5000.3	999	939
 106	 100.8	399	393
 106	 900.5	999	939
 106	4500.0	999	939
 107	2000.8	999	939
 107	2498.2	999	939
 107	2999.8	999	939
 107	4000.0	999	939
 111	1498.2	999	939
 112	5000.7	999	939
 114	6001.3	999	939
 115	2501.8	999	939
 117	 601.7	399	393
 117	 998.2	399	393
 119	2001.3	999	939
 119	4001.6	999	939
 120	2499.4	999	939
 122	2250.0	999	939
 123	4000.9	999	939
 126	2497.8	999	939
 126	3998.5	999	939
 127	4501.6	999	939
 128	  48.6	999	939
 128	4001.8	999	939
 129	3501.4	999	939
 130	1999.8	999	939
 130	2248.2	999	939
 130	3997.8	999	939
 132	3998.9	999	939
 133	2247.8	999	939
 133	2503.2	999	939
 133	4504.6	999	939
 134	3998.5	999	939
 135	3496.9	999	939
 135	3500.1	999	939
 136	3499.7	999	939
 138	4000.6	999	939
 139	4000.4	999	939
 140	4001.1	999	939
 141	4000.0	999	939
 142	2250.2	999	939
 143	3999.6	999	939
 144	3999.6	999	939
 145	 499.1	999	939
 145	3999.4	999	939
 145	4003.2	999	939
 146	2449.9	999	939
 146	3499.4	999	939
 150	3001.2	999	939
 153	3498.0	999	939
 158	3498.9	999	939
 159	3498.9	999	939
 162	 203.4	399	393
 163	 400.3	999	939
 163	 704.9	999	939
 
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/13 | Anderson, S. | NUTs | Website Updated | Yes | Data merged into online btl file, see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Merged the nutrients into the .sea files for P02E. 
 The nutrient file had two sta. 35.  When I compared the pressures of the second sta. 35 in the nutrient file with the pressures for sta. 36 in the .sea it was obvious that the station designation in the nutrient file should have been 36.
 
 Ditto above only for sta. 105.  Should have been 106 in the nutrient file.
 
 There were numerous levels throughout the file that had 0 as the sample and/or bottle number.  These levels had no data and were not in the .sea file and were not merged into the .sea file.
 
 Stas. 36 and 37 had at 5501.1 and 5500.5 respectively a value of 972.51 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  The QUALT1 flag was 9 for each of them.  These are impossible values for these
 parameters so I changed the values to -9.00.
 
 Sta. 40 at 1000.0db had 99 for QUALT1 flags but a value of 113.91 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT.  Changed PHSPHT value to -9.00, SILCAT value is reasonable.  Changed QUALT1 flags
 to 39.
 
 List of stations where QUALT1 flags were not consistent with the data.  I changed them so they agree with the data.
 
 NOTE - most of the QUALT1 flags in the nutrient file were 3, so I used 3 when changing Q1 codes, except in one case where the data were obviously bad.
 
 
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/04 | Michida, Y. | NUTs | Data are Public | Yes |  |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Today I heard that Dr. Saito, the PI for nutrient data of P2, sent an email to someone concerned in SIO (Lynne Talley? ) to make the data public.    I hope things go well in this regard. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/03 | Bartolacci, D. | BTL | Website Updated | Yes | Files Unencrypted except NUTs; See note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I have unencrypted the bottle file for both legs of this cruise, however the nutrients still reside in the original directory and are not yet merged into the bottle file. 
 Sarilee, Could you possibly merge these nutrients into the on-line bottle file? They're in the 'original' directory for P02E.
 
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/04/03 | Saito, H. | NUTs | Data are Public | Yes |  |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I heard from Yoritaka-san that P2E nutrient data have not yet public, then I would agree with these data will be public. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/03/09 | Yoritaka, H. | CTD/BTL | Data are Public | Yes | database updated as requested, see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I would like to consent to open Bottle_S/O2 and CTD data on P2E and P2W to the public as PI.  Then, would you please change some information on the summarized table of WHP one time cruises on web as follows; 
 P02E;
 CS: Bando/JODC -> Bando/(HD)MSA
 Ship: SYOYO -> SHOYO
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2001/02/21 | Diggs, S. | NUTs | Submitted | Yes | silcat, no2 no3, phspht |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I received P02C/E nutrients as well from Saito, and just reformatted them and placed them in the original directories for each line.  I'll have Stacy merge them in. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2000/10/02 | Fukasawa, M. | NUTs/CFCs | Data Update | n/a | NUTs sent to WHOI, CFCs not collected |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| As for P2C and E, nutrients data were collected and Dr. Saito, who is the PI, reported me that data was submitted to WHOI. PI of CFCs is Dr. Watanabe although CFC data were note collected on neither P2C nor P2E. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 2000/09/19 | Michida, Y. | BTL | Data Update | No |  |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| With regard to the hydrographic data collected by Japanese groups, I found that the present status of availability of the data for P02E and P02W appeared as 'NP' in the listings of WHPO web site. I believe they should be ready to be made public.   Have you had any contact to or from Mr Yoritaka, the present contact person for both lines? I will be pleased to ask him to confirm that the data are to be public, if necessary. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 1999/04/15 | Bartolacci, D. | SUM | Data Update | Yes | see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| I've replaced all of the p02.sum files (p02w, p02e, p02c) and updated the table to reflect this.  In the case of p02c and p02e the sum file changes  (via Lynne)were correcting the occurrances of the old line number designation with the new line number designation, and (by me)replacing the slashes in the expocode to underscores.  (See Lynne's emails below) 
 In the case of p02w the .sum file changes made (by Lynne) were converting decimal degrees into degrees and minutes in the lats and lons; the time was converted to GMT; station no. now has place holding zeros; cast type was changed from CTD to ROS; and height above bottom, wire out, and no. of bottles columns were also added.  This conversion has shifted columns, however I ran sumchk on it with no errors.  Slashes in the expocode were also replaced by underscores.
 
 I have also replaced the corrupted P2E119.WCT file with Lynne's updated version, and updated the table to reflect this.  The table was also corrected to reflect the *bottle* data file being encrypted, NOT the .sum file (previously the table indicated the .sum file was Non-public and the bottle file was public).
 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 1999/04/14 | Talley, L. | CTD | Data Update | No | see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| station 119 on p2e was corrupted.  It was sent in a 1 dbar series, unlike all of the other stations.  I decimated it to 2 dbar, changed the number of records in the header to match the 2 dbar series, and ftped it to the whpo site. 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 1999/04/13 | Talley, L. | SUM | Data Update | Yes | see note: |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| Steve - I placed corrected versions of p02csu.txt and p02esu.txt in my ftp area at whpo.  Please replace the online versions with these (and acknowledge).  (What did I change - replaced P02C in the P02E file with P02E,  replaced P02W in the P02C file with P02C).  Lynne 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 1998/10/19 | Thompson, B. | DELC14 | No Data Submitted | n/a | Masao Fukasawa/Tokai Univ. needs help processing C14 data |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| 
 |  |  
 
 
| 
	| Date Entered | Person | Data Type | Data Status | Public | Summary |  
	| 1998/08/30 | Talley, L. | BTL | Data Update | No | quality flags added; formatting updated |  
	| Detailed Notes
 |  
	| 
 |  |  | 
 |